This article seeks to present an outline of opinion on the region in which the Sun’s magnetic field is the dokminant influence. References are presented with summaries of content by the author.

A survey comprising 500 pedigree dogs was realised in the Paris region. For each dog six behavioural traits were determined and ten of their astrological traits were retained. A statistical interpretation of the possible relationships between the two sets of traits was performed with permutation tests. Two strong associations were detected between the angular positions of Jupiter and the Sun, and the extraversion dominant trait. Other associations were also suggested. Remarkably, these associations are similar to standard indications proposed by astrology for humans.

This is a critical comment on the work of Professor Edward Dewey (see “The 9.22 year cycle on grasshopper abundance, Correlation old edition 5 Autumn 1969) on sunspot influence where Dewey concluded from a study involving the analysis of economic and sociological cycles, that the main sunspot cycle was 22.22 years, double the length that had normally been hitherto assumed. Gillman exhorts astrologers to give attention to the intervals occurring between successive planetary conjunctions in this new sunspot cycle as this may lead, eventually, to an explanation of how planets are able to exert an influene upon life on earth.

Book review:

Collections of papers presented at conferences are not always the most interesting of books. They have their uses, of course, enabling those who were unable to attend the conference to read what was said, and as archive material for later researchers to refer to, but the editors of collections of papers rarely set their sights any higher than aiming to provide a record.
This book, however, is different. The editors and conference organisers realised that with the inaugural conference of a totally new academic centre, specialising in a discipline which is itself new, the book would not only have to provide a record of what was presented, but would also become the benchmark for the centre itself, and to some extent for the whole area of study, defining the field for those who would follow. The book amply demonstrates that their vision has been fully realised. The speakers and contributors, too, appear to have been aware of the significance of the occasion, and have each given of their very best, papers which are not only excellent in themselves but which also open the way to further research and debate.
There are fifteen papers here, plus introductory pieces by Patrick Curry, and Nicholas Campion, who is head of the Sophia Centre The papers are wide-ranging in both content and approach: some are straightforward historical studies, spanning eras from the classical world through the Renaissance to early Modern England, while others approach the subject from a more scientific view, and one is a statistical study. Several debate how cultural astronomy and astrology could or should be studied in an academic environment, and a couple comment on how doing so would inevitably create intellectual tensions and divisions, to the detriment of the subject itself.
There are, of course, tensions and divisions within the astrological community, and several of these papers carry with them the political message of their authors. This is unavoidable. Yet these undercurrents are very much a part of the state of astrology in the present day, and a fit subject for study. The astrologer and his prejudices and preoccupations are part of what gives astrology its vitality, and should therefore be viewed as part of the whole phenomenon. Some readers may find it strange that two of the papers in this collection care concerned with the interpretation of horoscopes corresponding to the dates of the conference – yet it would be stranger still to exclude them, for the horoscope and its symbols are the specific language of astrology, and it is this language and its contribution to our wider culture that the Sophia Centre aims to study.
It is interesting, too, to note the subtle differences between papers written by those who are ‘inside’ the practice of astrology, and those who stand outside. Prudence Jones’ ‘Aspects of Deity’ is carefully researched and clearly presented, without a hint of that over-enthusiasm or tendency to leap to unsupportable conclusions to which other ‘insiders’ are sometimes prone, yet it is equally clear that her standpoint is firmly within the practice, speaking from experience rather than standing outside looking in. Her closing sentences are almost a mission statement for the whole Sophia enterprise when she says that ‘…astrological knowledge can help historical research. …It allows us to find our way easily around the structure of ancient cosmology and to unpick ambiguous definitions. …Without insider knowledge we are lost when dealing with the astrological worldview of Hellenistic (and much earlier) philosophy. With it we can begin to make sense of otherwise baffling imagery.’
It is particularly pleasing to note that as well as offering a wide historical and philosophical range, this collection also offers a wide geographical range in that it contains contributions from scholars in France, Spain, Finland, Poland, Brazil and the US. Such genuinely worldwide participation can only be applauded and, it is hoped, continued in the future.
The fact that fifteen papers of such widely different topics and viewpoints can sit side-by-side with each other and be taken together as valid approaches to a multifaceted subject is due in no small measure to the wonderfully broad and accommodating envelope laid out by Campion’s introduction. His overview of the history of the study and the strands within it gives everything its due place and makes sense of a difficult subject. For once, the introduction really does introduce what follows, helping the reader place the papers in context.
The book makes no secret of the fact that it is intended to be an advertisement for the Sophia Centre and its work, but it does it in the best possible way, by showing what excellent work has already been done and inviting the reader to join in and continue what has been started. For anyone interested in history, cosmology, philosophy, anthropology, or symbology; or for anyone who recognises that an interdisciplinary approach works wonders in refreshing tired or worn-out modes of thought, this book is worth reading. It manages to be more than just a record of a conference, and more, too, than a manifesto: in terms of the relationship between astrological and academic thinking, it is a window on the past, a snapshot of the present, and a blueprint for the future, all in one.
Bernard Eccles

Book Review

If astrology has been a source of reflection for thousands of years, it has also been from time immemorial, and indeed it still is, a victim of those practitioners whose venal considerations outweigh their intellectual rigour, and this has contributed to the discredit of the subject with the public at large.
In an exercise of rehabilitation of the subject, this book by S. Fuzeau-Braesch takes a new, popularised approach and its great originality is that it is based on scientific experiment. The disconcerting results quoted in the work are rendered credible by the tests to which the data have been subjected.
For more than thirty years S. Fuzeau-Braesch has combined her knowledge of the stars with the scientific rigour which has governed her professional career (she is a Doctor of Science = D.Sc, and honorary director of research at the CNRS the French National Scientific Research Centre, and directed a university laboratory of biology for more than 20 years).
The stringency of the experimental protocols suggested and the statistical exploitation of the results obtained provides solid evidence to reinforce a certain confidence that one can nowadays have in astrology. It is this methodical approach that is resurrecting astrology as an accepted discipline likely to find its place one day as an academic subject worthy of university study. Amongst the cases investigated, the astrology of dogs clearly demonstrates the obvious objectivity of possible astrological analyses.
Of all the works which have established the existence of a link between the astrological sky at the birth of the individual and human potentialities, this book is distinguished by the fact that the author demonstrates, and does not merely assert, that astrology is reliable and capable of revealing the ego and the aptitudes of an individual, and furthermore, to establish a chronology of the significant dates of a lifetime (without prejudice to the positive or negative aspects of the associated events).
A dominant theme of the book is the need to take into account only those simple elements from amongst the astrological tools which have been verified experimentally. This is obviously a significant point. Interviews with ten well known personalities in France familiarise the reader with astrological analysis in a lively manner, full of interest.
Like any other modern field of human knowledge, astrology must be associated with other disciplines. Here it is notably molecular neurobiology and psychology which, to reveal the inner reality of the individual; sensitivity, talents, charisma, sexuality and social influence while allowing a certain attention to be paid to fateful dates.
To include man thus in a molecular equation involving astral dependence is a modern concept which can surprise or shock. Is one to deny the role of neurotransmitters and hormones in human behaviour? The author, convinced that causality in astrological phenomena exists, concludes with a chapter devoted to hypotheses compatible with current scientific opinion.
Fuzeau-Braesch’s book – a true event in France – is remarkable for its didacticism but also for its generosity in that it makes so much accessible to the layman. It is sure to stimulate interest and perhaps even to motivate young scientists to tackle this subject of research though, it must be admitted, they would do so at their risk and peril given the Cartesian views prevailing in French universities. The questions raised are of great interest in our time, not because they are new in themselves, but because of the kind of investigation to which they can nowadays be subjected.
The style of this work is deliberately clear, stripped down and accessible to everyone and it includes instructions which will allow readers to interpret for themselves the sky under which they were born and to analyse simply and quickly the astral influences prevailing at their time of birth.
Jean Dietrich, Physiologist
Maître de conférence des Universités

Aviation makes a good subject for astrological enquiry, precisely recorded and accurately timed events allow the casting of reliable horoscopes. The author has used this foundation to great effect in ways that will in all likelihood, surprise, intrigue and stimulate the reader.

The breadth of this work is impressive; it not only examines the hypothesis that the fifth degree of Sagittarius has special significance in aviation but also links astrologically different facets of human flight, such as the growth of commercial flights, in a convincing and enlightening way. He postulates, and I think convincingly, a special importance for the black Moon in aviation; following a thread that runs throughout the book the reader is left with a tangible sense of this significance.

This is not just a book solely for what must admittedly be a small number of astrological practioners interested in the history and development of aviation; rather it is also a fine and useful example of contemporary astrological practice. The author’s approach and methods could as easily be applied to natal, mundane or other groups of event charts. England lucidly demonstrates the thinking and processes used by a modern astrologer at work. He weaves astrological connections using a wide variety of techniques including eclipses, solar return, new moons and astro-carto-graphical maps.

Tracing the astrologically significant events connected with the ill fated Comet jet airliner. England explores the nativities of pilots, designer, company, test flights, and connects progressed charts, maps and more besides to produce a commendably rich and vivid picture of a series of events that had both sometimes tragic individual consequences well as national import. I found this chapter particularly riveting.

Clear charts, interesting colour and black and white photographs coupled with a clean and intelligible layout invite the reader to explore the enormous amount of astrology going on within. However, it is the writing style that really aids the reader in absorbing so much astrology and makes this book refreshingly unusual. The narrative is presented in a “fictional style” that draws the reader in and brings the subject matter alive. He suggests feelings and emotions for the major characters involved which serves to give a sense of meaning and consequence to the unfolding events he describes. He places himself, and therefore us, as astrologers, at the heart of the action; this approach, both fascinating and stimulating, serves to impart a sense of drama and relevance that otherwise might be missing. By imagining himself as a consultant astrologer actively working with key characters as events unfold he conveys a vivid significance and contemporary relevance that in places has the sort of pace and excitation more commonly associated with thrillers.

Degrees of Flight is a multifaceted work, it is an interesting commentary of the development of aviation, a well balanced exposition of astrological practices, a reliable and well sourced collection of astrological data and perhaps surprisingly, if one were to consider the title alone, a thoroughly good and commendably rewarding read.

Reviewed by Sean Lovatt

Recent developments in science – particularly quantum theory – have been taken by some astrologers to herald a paradigm shift that would make it possible to validate and explain astrology as a science. The suggestion is made that this case is currently unconvincing. The realist (or foundationalist) model is considered as a philosophical tradition, with particular reference to Descartes. It is proposed that this tradition underpins much of the sceptical case against astrology (illustrated by reference to the work of Dean, Ertel, Kelly, Mather and Smit); but that its claims to provide a comprehensively explanatory model have been undermined by modern science. Two models of astrology – as an empirical science, and as divination – are considered. It is submitted for the reader’s consideration that, by undermining the realist/foundationalist model, modern science (as defined in this paper) does make a contribution to the understanding of astrology; but that this is more supportive of astrology as a divinatory art than as a hard science.

In two previous articles I have searched for ways of understanding the Gauquelin Effect in evolutionary terms with the aid of the new variable of birth order in families, (Douglas 2001a, 2004a,b). I now want to report on some hitherto unknown Solar patterns which have emerged from a study of the Gauquelin data. These patterns also vary systematically between professional groups in a way that suggests for the first time a place for some early Greek and Roman measures of planetary strength in horoscopes. It is suggested that the Gauquelins’ research was weakened by their neglect of early astrological texts and traditions concerning the sun and moon, and that the effect cannot be described accurately without referring to these real effects. A 3-stage mechanism is proposed to describe the Gauquelin Effect in terms of the conjunction cycles of the sun with the planets. The results presented are discussed in the light of Seymour’s theory of astrology. The current revival of interest in traditional techniques among astrologers may provide an opportunity for a new collaboration with researchers, and more awareness of the incompleteness of the astrology that came out of the 19th century revival.

The planets, from an astrological point of view, are related to their visible characteristics and not to any scientific description. This is confirmed by Gauquelin’s failure to detect any correlations with the non-visible (outer) planets. The author extends this observation to argue that science is not any special preserve, but a mere facet of existence, and its ability to demonstrate astrological truth just incidental

Author: Dr. Geoffrey DeanAbstract: Keywords: Gauquelin, planetary effects, attribution, G-effects, artifactsNotes:Publication: Correlation Journal of Reserach into AstrologyIssue: Volume 23 Number 2Dated: 2006Pages: 53 – 57