|Title||The perceived efficacy of various "future-ologies" and complementary medicine|
|Publication||Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine|
|Keywords||belief, therapies, alternative,|
|OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between beliefs in ways of telling the future (astrology, graphology, palmistry etc) and beliefs in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). DESIGN: Participants completed a short questionnaire that requested that they rate the efficacy of 8 CAM therapies along with 12 other ways of predicting the future ranging from the well known and established (astrology) to the less well known (tasseography, oneiromancy). Short descriptions of each were provided. They also answered four attitude statements on science as applied to medicine. SUBJECTS: Two hundred three (130 female, 73 male) adult Britains obtained from a university subject panel served as unpaid volunteer subjects. RESULTS: CAM therapies were judged as modestly effective and most of the other "-ologies" ineffective. Further analysis confirmed two clear factors with the different methods loading on two different factors. Regressions showed females who were less concerned with scientific evaluations but more concerned with treatment believed more in the efficacy of the "future-ologies." Also females, who had heard of fewer "future-ologies" but more CAM practices were more likely to believe in the efficacy of CAM therapies. CONCLUSION: Belief in CAM is unrelated to belief in "future-ologies." Interest in the scientific evaluations of treatment is the best predictor of beliefs about efficacy.|
The RGCSA has an agreement with the AA, the publishers of the research Journal Correlation, to make articles contained in the journal available by request and on observation of copyright rules. If you wish to request full copies of any of the abstracted articles from Correlation contained on the RGCSA database you can do so by completing and returning, with payment, the articles request form. This form should be completed and downloaded so that you may sign the copyright declaration contained within it. When the AA has received this form, with your signature, together with payment, the article will then be despatched to you, normally within fourteen days of receiving your request. For copyright reasons you must sign the form and return it before a copy of the article can be released to you. UK copyright law currently insists on actual signatures so an electronically mailed signature is not acceptable. We look forward to receiving your requests and hope that you will enjoy this new service.
© 2009 Research Grants for the Critical Study of Astrology